A clean month
$99you pay
- You recovered
- $0
- Our 20% share
- $0
- Net to you
- −$99
The invoice was correct — which is the answer you were paying for.
Pricing
Every cent on your invoice traces to a specific credit, from a specific claim, on a specific date, and the billing screen shows that trail. Fractions of a cent round in your favour.
No charge for findings, no charge for seats, no minimum term. Nothing here is an offer until it is in a signed order.
The cap is the load-bearing promise on this page, so here is the arithmetic behind it rather than the claim on its own. This is the same calculation the billing screen runs.
A clean month
$99you pay
The invoice was correct — which is the answer you were paying for.
A month with one finding
$299you pay
The $99 base, plus a fifth of what actually arrived and was recorded as a credit.
The ceiling
$499you pay
The share stops here. Every dollar you recover above $2,000 is yours.
Every one of those months includes
The cap starts to bite at $2,000 recovered in a month. Past that, every additional credit is yours.
Fifteen firms audit logistics invoices for a living. We went looking for what they cost, on their own websites, in September 2026.
Of the six that do publish, five take a cut of whatever they recover and none of them stop. The more they find, the more you hand over. That is the line this page is really about.
| Provider | Published price | Ceiling |
|---|---|---|
| SpendVerify | $99 + 20% | $499 a month |
| Implentio — the closest thing to a direct rival, and the only one auditing 3PL invoices that names a number | From $1,000/mo | n/a — it is the floor |
| Refund Retriever | 40–50% of recovery | none |
| LateShipment | 25–35% of recovery | none |
| ShipScience | 35% of recovery | none |
| A consultant, once | $5,000–$25,000 | none |
| AFS, Trax, Cass, nVision, Intelligent Audit, Share a Refund, FreightOptics, 3PL Invoice Audit, Reveel | No price published | |
Checked on their own pricing pages, 1 September 2026. Refund Retriever’s page carries a 2019 timestamp, so treat that one as the oldest figure here. Where a firm publishes a range, the range is theirs, not ours.
The share is calculated from credits that landed, not from findings we reported. A finding is an argument; a credit is money. Charging for the first would mean charging for being loud.
There is no charge for findings, no charge for seats, and no minimum term.
They are founding terms, offered to the first customers while the product has no settled recovery rate to price against. That is the same thing the about page says about having no customers yet: a rate quoted from no completed claims would be a number invented for a slide.
What will not move is the shape. A fixed base, a share only on money that arrived, and a ceiling you know before you start.