Load your rate card
Upload the contract; confirm each line it proposes, every one carrying the quote it came from.
Third-party logistics
Your 3PL overbilled you last month. Prove it.
One clause from a real rate card, live. Change it and watch a tier billed flat come apart.
The clause · editableReceiving fees
Receiving — $ per carton up to, $ per carton thereafter.
320
Billed at the flat rate$400.00
Your contract allows$364.00
Overbilled$36.00
200 × $1.25 = $250.00120 × $0.95 = $114.00$364.00
The same arithmetic the engine runs — deterministic, in your browser, nothing sent anywhere.
Priced with a monthly cap. You never pay more than the cap, however much you recover.
The comparison
Seven rate lines. Six invoice lines. One that doesn’t match.
| Pick & pack — first item | $3.00 / order |
| Additional item | $0.50 / item |
| Receiving — to 200 | $1.25 / carton |
| Receiving — thereafter | $0.95 / carton |
| Pallet storage | $18.00 / pallet / mo |
| Return processing | $2.50 + $0.35 / item |
| Monthly minimum | $150.00 |
| Pick and pack fees | $1,950.00 |
| Receiving fees | $400.00 |
| Storage fees | $765.00 |
| Return processing | $116.35 |
| Value-added services | $315.00 |
| Platform fee | $250.00 |
| Total | $3,796.35 |
The agreement states two brackets · the invoice arrived as one flat amount
How it works
Four steps. The last one is the credit note.
Record the month
Orders, cartons, pallets, returns — each figure marked with where it came from.
Run the audit
The engine prices the month, compares it line by line, and says how much it could verify.
Send the claim
A letter with the clause and the arithmetic inside, sent from your own inbox.
The deliverable
The claim writes itself.
No product name, no jargon. Written for someone in accounts receivable who has never heard of us — and it closes by asking them to correct us if the figures are wrong.
Not a mock-upThe letter below is generated by the product. This is the screen it is generated on:
Claim for billing correction
We have compared this invoice against our agreement and our records of the work performed. We believe 1 charge was billed incorrectly, totalling $36.00.
What we believe happened: the volume tiers in our agreement were not applied.
- Invoice line
- “Receiving fees”
- Charged
- $400.00
- Our agreement gives
- $364.00
- Difference
- $36.00
The clause we are reading
Receiving — $1.25/carton to 200,
$0.95/carton thereafter
The volumes this rests on
CARTONS_RECEIVED 320
If our figures are wrong, please tell us where.
Why trust it
Built to be believed.
AI transcribes. It never calculates.
A model proposes what your contract says. Not one cent is computed by one.
Every figure says where it came from.
A finding resting on a typed number is marked unverified, on screen, before you send it.
What cannot be defended is not claimed.
Undercharges are shown but never claimed. Asking would be asking to be invoiced.
- Every month
- A fixed base, what you pay whatever happens.
- Only on recovery
- A share of credits that actually arrived and were recorded.
- Known in advance
- A monthly cap. Recover $500 or $50,000, you never pay more than the cap.
The figures are being set with the first customers, who get founding terms.
Start with last month’s invoice.
You are buying spend predictability; a price you cannot forecast would contradict the product on its own invoice.